Univalent Category of SETOIDs , Setoids are not LCCC#1152
Draft
marcinjangrzybowski wants to merge 22 commits intoagda:masterfrom
Draft
Univalent Category of SETOIDs , Setoids are not LCCC#1152marcinjangrzybowski wants to merge 22 commits intoagda:masterfrom
marcinjangrzybowski wants to merge 22 commits intoagda:masterfrom
Conversation
* Cubical/Categories/Category/Path.agda Helper representation of Path between categories to deal with ineficiency in WeakEquivalence.agda * Cubical/Relation/Binary/Setoid.agda Setoid - Pair of hSet and propositional equivalence relation * Cubical/Categories/Instances/Setoids.agda Univalent Category of Setoids changes: * Cubical/Categories/Adjoint.agda added composiiton of adjunctions * Cubical/Categories/Equivalence/WeakEquivalence.agda Equivalence equivalent to Path for Univalent Categories * Cubical/Categories/Instances/Functors.agda currying of functors is an isomorphism. * Cubical/Foundations/Transport.agda transport-filler-ua = ua-gluePath + some other minor helpers
Contributor
Author
|
Depends on #1120 |
removed unifnished code
Collaborator
|
A couple of things before a more detailed review:
|
Contributor
Author
|
fixed dead link
anshwad10
reviewed
Feb 17, 2025
| ΣℙCat = ΣPropCat | ||
|
|
||
| isSmall : (C : Category ℓ ℓ') → Type ℓ | ||
| isSmall C = isSet (C .ob) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think isSmall is a good name; These categories are conventionally called 'strict' categories, and calling them 'small' gives the impression that this is about universe level, which it's not.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
how about isStrict ? I do not have anything more descriptive in mind
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cubical/Relation/Binary/Setoid.agda
Cubical/Categories/Instances/Setoids.agda
¬BaseChange⊣SetoidΠ- Base change functor does not have right adjoint (so SETOID cannot be LCCC, at least not in the literal sense) implementation ofSetoids are not an LCCCby Thorsten Altenkirch and Nicolai Kraus (https://nicolaikraus.github.io/docs/setoids.pdf)